UncleSam's BLOG news 
Related Articles
In a stunning turn of events, the Federal government has taken a decisive step by dissolving the Secretariat of the Advertising Standard Panel (ASP) responsible for approving the contentious “All Eyes on The Judiciary” billboards, which had failed to meet vetting guidelines.
This move raises questions about the motivations behind such a billboard and sheds light on the issue of hypocrisy among certain groups.
The concept of hypocrisy, a practice involving a contradiction between stated beliefs and actions, has come into sharp focus. It entails presenting oneself as virtuous, honest, or morally upright while engaging in behaviors that are incongruent with these values. In essence, it is a betrayal of integrity and authenticity.
The “All Eyes on The Judiciary” billboard raises concerns about its true purpose – could it be a means of incitement if an unfavorable judgment is handed down against the Obidients? This raises a crucial point: where were such billboards when other situations demanded attention? Has the same energy been dedicated to addressing broader societal issues?
But let’s pause and reflect – How many billboards have they erected in the East condemning the Sit-At-Home orders by IPOB? How often have they stood as the moral compass of society when times have been tough?
An unsettling pattern emerges when analyzing the actions of the Obidients. Their history in election campaigns reveals a dangerous trend of intense hatred and divisive tactics. Strangely, those who accuse others of election manipulation remain tight-lipped about instances of voter intimidation and campaign disruptions in the East. This inconsistency casts a shadow of hypocrisy over their stance.
In examining their actions, one can’t help but notice the stark difference between their words and deeds. This double standard points to a lack of authenticity and self-awareness, as well as an unwillingness to be held accountable for their actions. Such behavior erodes trust and credibility, raising questions about the true motives behind their claims.
Ironically, these same individuals who boast about predicting Tinubu’s potential downfall from office are simultaneously exhibiting arrogance by intimidating judges. This blatant display of arrogance underscores the depths of their hypocrisy. It calls into question their commitment to justice and fairness, revealing a disturbing gap between their professed ideals and actual behavior.
The controversy surrounding the “All Eyes on The Judiciary” billboard serves as a potent reminder of the dangers of hypocrisy.
It highlights the need for consistent values and actions, as well as the importance of scrutinizing the motivations behind public displays. As the nation watches this unfolding drama, it becomes increasingly apparent that hypocrisy is not only a contradiction of principles but also a betrayal of the public’s trust.
Osigwe Omo-Ikirodah is the Chairman and CEO of Bush Radio Academy.
Source iReporteronline.
